SWIFT CSP · CSCF · KYC-SA
Your attestation deadline should not be an annual crisis
Every year the CSCF tightens, the deadline lands, and your teams drop everything to feed an assessment. There is another way to live this: an independent assessor who arrives with the evidence pipeline already industrialised.
The record
What you get
Assessment, evidence and attestation — one engagement
A full independent assessment against the current CSCF: control evaluation, vulnerability identification, configuration review and recommendations you can defend to counterparties. Evidence collection runs through EviGen on Windows, macOS and Linux — which is why most of our SWIFT customers now require it by default — and your findings arrive structured for direct KYC-SA attestation. Policies, incident response plans and risk assessments are reviewed in the same pass, so nothing surfaces twice.
How it runs
1 · Scope
Architecture type, components in scope, control applicability — settled in one working session.
2 · Evidence
EviGen collects; your engineers keep their weeks. Interviews fill what machines cannot answer.
3 · Assess
Controls evaluated against the CSCF, observations drafted, findings reviewed with you before they harden.
4 · Attest
Structured results ready for KYC-SA, with recommendations ranked by risk, not by page count.
Independence
Assessment and tooling are separated by design: our assessors evaluate controls; EviGen collects facts. We do not remediate what we audit, and we say no to engagements where independence could be questioned. Your counterparties read the same attestation your regulator does — it has to hold.
Beyond SWIFT
The same assessor pool delivers DORA, NIS 2, LPM and ISO/IEC 27001 audits — one relationship, every framework you answer to.